MCP & Integrations
PulseMCP
Last updated 2026-06-28 · benchmark measured 2026-08-11 — deterministic & reproducible
A directory and newsletter covering the Model Context Protocol ecosystem.
Is PulseMCP production-ready?
Legit.Show scores PulseMCP 79 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on PulseMCP (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Performance. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 50/100
- Accessibility — 90/100
- Security — 80/100
- Privacy — 75/100
- Reliability — 100/100
- Standards — 86/100
- Discoverability — 70/100
What we measured
- Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
- No Content-Security-Policy.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Real Lighthouse performance run — 396 ms to first byte.
- Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
- 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
- Has a reachable privacy policy.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Who built it
Tadas Antanavicius (@tadasayy) · product account @pulsemcp
Who it's for
AI developers · MCP contributors · AI enthusiasts · Enterprise teams · Protocol adopters
Pricing
Free tier with 200 non-expiring credits; $9/month for 1,000 credits ($0.009 per search).
Visit PulseMCP → · Alternatives to PulseMCP → · How this was measured →