Legit.Show measured datatomcp's Security frame at 80/100. Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure datatomcp?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

MCP & Integrations

datatomcp

Last updated 2026-11-12 · benchmark measured 2026-11-12 — deterministic & reproducible

MCP server that gives AI agents read-only access to your databases, sheets, and apps.

96/100

7/7 frames

Top 6% of 19,084 measured

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-11-12 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of datatomcp? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/datatomcp-com/2026-11-12. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored datatomcp 96/100 on 2026-11-12, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/datatomcp-com/2026-11-12

Is datatomcp production-ready?

Legit.Show scores datatomcp 96 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on datatomcp (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Accessibility; its weakest is Security. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 98/100
Accessibility — 100/100
Security — 80/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 92/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
No Content-Security-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 193 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who it's for

Teams without a data team · Operations and finance teams · Product teams · Agencies · Consultants

Pricing

Free: 3 datasets, 100,000 rows each, 1,000 queries/day, 1 workspace, 2 people. Pro: €12/$12/month for 25 datasets, 2M rows each, 50,000 queries/day, Google Sheets sync, 3 workspaces, 5 people, 90-day

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from datatomcp.com's own website on 2026-11-12.
Operator: Killian Helf, as named in datatomcp.com's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-11-12.

Put together from public information, without datatomcp's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit datatomcp → · Alternatives to datatomcp → · How this was measured →