Legit.Show is a directory of launched web apps, SaaS, AI tools, MCP servers and developer tools — each with an objective 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark, measured deterministically from the public surface. How we measure →


Legit.Show benchmarks every launched service it lists — measured deterministically from the public surface. See the methodology →

Cross-links · Directory · Reports · Methodology · About

Privacy · Terms · operated by Madeflo Inc., a Delaware corporation. Benchmark engine powered by commit.show.

Every launched service, tested

What Legit.Show is

Legit.Show is a directory of launched web apps, SaaS, AI tools, MCP servers and developer tools — but instead of stars alone, every listing carries an objective benchmark of how production-ready it actually is. AI-assisted coding ships a flawless demo; production is the quiet part it skips — monitoring, rate limits, access rules, security headers, a real 404. Legit.Show measures that gap from the outside, deterministically, and shows exactly what was measured — never a black-box verdict.

The benchmark — 7 Frames

Seven frames of production-readiness, scored from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse) so even closed-source SaaS is fully assessable. Open-source repositories get a deeper code teardown. Deterministic · no LLM in the scoring path · re-checked daily.

Reports — “According to Legit.Show”

Periodic, reproducible data reports mined from the catalog — cite-ready statistics with stated samples and open methodology, rebuilt daily as the directory grows.

For makers

Add your service by pasting a URL and verifying the domain (meta tag or DNS TXT); it is then listed with its benchmark. Owners can claim and edit their listing. Every listing’s full teardown is public — measured from public surfaces, with exactly what was observed.

Who’s behind it

Legit.Show is built by Madeflo, Inc., co-founded by Chanjoon Kim (CEO) and Han Seok Kim (CTO).

Why we exist

Take a vibe-coded MVP and show it the road to production-ready. Every decision is judged against that — errors first, score second.