Developer Tools

Marginal

Last updated 2026-08-19 · benchmark measured 2026-08-19 — deterministic & reproducible

LLM cost tracking that breaks down AI spend by customer, feature, and model.

Is Marginal production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Marginal 58 out of 100 — the simple average of its 6 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Marginal (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Performance; its weakest is Privacy. 6 of the seven frames returned a score; Accessibility was not measurable on this service and is recorded as null — not as zero. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — 80/100
• Accessibility — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
• Security — 45/100
• Privacy — 25/100
• Reliability — 75/100
• Standards — 75/100
• Discoverability — 45/100

What we measured

• Security headers present: HSTS.
• No Content-Security-Policy.
• Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
• Real Lighthouse performance run — 216 ms to first byte.
• 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
• No privacy policy found.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
• Discoverable: sitemap.

Who it's for

AI product teams · developers using LLMs · teams tracking AI costs · SaaS platforms with AI features

Visit Marginal → · Alternatives to Marginal → · How this was measured →