Productivity

Zush

Last updated 2026-09-02 · benchmark measured 2026-09-02 — deterministic & reproducible

AI-powered file renamer that reads content to generate descriptive filenames.

Is Zush production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Zush 91 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Zush (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — 87/100
• Accessibility — 95/100
• Security — 80/100
• Privacy — 75/100
• Reliability — 100/100
• Standards — 100/100
• Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

• Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
• No Content-Security-Policy.
• Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
• Real Lighthouse performance run — 533 ms to first byte.
• Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
• 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
• Has a reachable privacy policy.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who built it

Kirill Isachenko (@lirik1986) · product account @zush_app

Who it's for

Mac users · Windows users · Knowledge workers · File organization enthusiasts · Batch processors

Pricing

Free plan with 50 AI renames; PRO Monthly $10/month or PRO One-Time $36 (was $48, 25% off with code ZUSH25)

Visit Zush → · Alternatives to Zush → · How this was measured →