AI & Agents
Ziva
Last updated 2026-08-28 · benchmark measured 2026-08-28 — deterministic & reproducible
AI coding assistant and playtester built specifically for Godot 4 game development.
Is Ziva production-ready?
Legit.Show scores Ziva 80 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Ziva (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Security. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 63/100
- Accessibility — 91/100
- Security — 45/100
- Privacy — 75/100
- Reliability — 100/100
- Standards — 89/100
- Discoverability — 100/100
What we measured
- Security headers present: HSTS.
- No Content-Security-Policy.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Real Lighthouse performance run — 145 ms to first byte.
- Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
- 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
- Has a reachable privacy policy.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Who it's for
Game studios · Indie developers · Casual developers · Game QA teams · Multi-engine developers
Pricing
Free tier with $3/month AI usage; Hobby: Free-$3/mo; Basic: $20/mo ($60 AI usage); Pro: $50/mo ($150 AI usage); Ultra: $200/mo ($600 AI usage)
Visit Ziva → · Alternatives to Ziva → · How this was measured →