AI & Agents
Waku
Last updated 2026-08-16 · benchmark measured 2026-08-16 — deterministic & reproducible
A native macOS app for managing multiple coding agent CLIs in one place.
Is Waku production-ready?
Legit.Show scores Waku 66 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Waku (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Accessibility; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 75/100
- Accessibility — 93/100
- Security — 25/100
- Privacy — 25/100
- Reliability — 92/100
- Standards — 89/100
- Discoverability — 60/100
What we measured
- No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Real Lighthouse performance run — 216 ms to first byte.
- Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
- 0 of 0 sampled routes reachable.
- No privacy policy found.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
- Discoverable: OpenGraph image.
Who it's for
AI/coding agents users · Developers · Software engineers · Agent CLI operators
Visit Waku → · Alternatives to Waku → · How this was measured →