Is Screen Fasting secure?

Legit.Show measured Screen Fasting's Security frame at 25/100. No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure Screen Fasting?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Productivity

Screen Fasting

Last updated 2026-10-24 · benchmark measured 2026-10-24 — deterministic & reproducible

Screen Fasting locks your iPhone for a set period using iOS Assistive Access.

80/100

7/7 frames

Top 47% of 17,375 measured · #14 of 20 in screen time blocker

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-10-24 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of Screen Fasting? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/tryscreenfasting-com/2026-10-24. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Screen Fasting 80/100 on 2026-10-24, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/tryscreenfasting-com/2026-10-24

Is Screen Fasting production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Screen Fasting 80 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Screen Fasting (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Privacy; its weakest is Security. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 98/100
Accessibility — 96/100
Security — 25/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 92/100
Standards — 92/100
Discoverability — 60/100

What we measured

No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 91 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
0 of 0 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Discoverable: OpenGraph image.

Who it's for

iPhone users · Digital wellness seekers · People struggling with phone addiction · Those wanting accountability

Pricing

Free ($0, 5 fasts/month, up to 8 hours); Pro ($3.75/mo billed annually at $45/year, unlimited fasts up to 30 days, weekly human coach)

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from tryscreenfasting.com's own website on 2026-10-24.
Operator: Screen Fasting, as named in tryscreenfasting.com's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-10-24.

Put together from public information, without Screen Fasting's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Screen Fasting → · Alternatives to Screen Fasting → · How this was measured →