Developer Tools

Trunchbull

Last updated 2026-08-15 · benchmark measured 2026-08-15 — deterministic & reproducible

A platform for benchmarking AI models against tools deployed from GitHub repositories.

Is Trunchbull production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Trunchbull 86 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Trunchbull (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Security; its weakest is Discoverability. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — 95/100
• Accessibility — 96/100
• Security — 100/100
• Privacy — 100/100
• Reliability — 90/100
• Standards — 85/100
• Discoverability — 35/100

What we measured

• Security headers present: CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
• Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
• Real Lighthouse performance run — 710 ms to first byte.
• Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
• 2 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
• Has a reachable privacy policy.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who it's for

ML engineers · Researchers · Model evaluators · AI developers

Pricing

Free: $0 (1,000 tool calls/month, up to 5 benchmarks); Open Beta: $59.99/month (250,000 tool calls/month, sandbox hours included)

Visit Trunchbull → · Alternatives to Trunchbull → · How this was measured →