Productivity
TimeTailor
Last updated 2026-08-24 · benchmark measured 2026-08-24 — deterministic & reproducible
Appointment booking and management software built for salons.
Is TimeTailor production-ready?
Legit.Show scores TimeTailor 71 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on TimeTailor (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Security. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 47/100
- Accessibility — 93/100
- Security — 25/100
- Privacy — 70/100
- Reliability — 100/100
- Standards — 100/100
- Discoverability — 60/100
What we measured
- No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Real Lighthouse performance run — 86 ms to first byte.
- Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
- 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
- Has a reachable privacy policy.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
- Discoverable: structured data, sitemap.
Who built it
Oliver Auerbach · product account @TimeTailor_app
Who it's for
Hair salons · Beauty salons · Barbershops · Nail salons · Spas · Small salon owners
Pricing
Free for manually inserted appointments; 3.9% fee on online bookings (can be passed to client); Optional add-ons: $12/mo no-show protection, $9/mo advanced reporting, $15/mo professional website
Visit TimeTailor → · Alternatives to TimeTailor → · How this was measured →