Legit.Show measured terma's Security frame at 45/100. Security headers present: X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure terma?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Productivity

terma

Last updated 2026-09-18 · benchmark measured 2026-09-18 — deterministic & reproducible

Terma tracks subscriptions and contracts by scanning documents, no bank login required.

80/100

7/7 frames

Top 44% of 14,138 measured · #9 of 14 in subscription tracker

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-18 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of terma? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/terma-corebits-uk/2026-09-18. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored terma 80/100 on 2026-09-18, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/terma-corebits-uk/2026-09-18

Is terma production-ready?

Legit.Show scores terma 80 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on terma (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Standards; its weakest is Security. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 74/100
Accessibility — 88/100
Security — 45/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 75/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 75/100
Standards — 100/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

Security headers present: X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 132 ms to first byte.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Discoverable: structured data, sitemap, OpenGraph image, canonical URL.

Who it's for

Subscription managers · Household budget planners · People wanting to reduce subscription creep · Contract trackers · Cost-conscious consumers

Pricing

Free ($0 forever, 3 items, 2 AI scans/month); Plus ($4.99 every 4 weeks, 5 items, 3 AI scans/month); Pro ($9.99 every 4 weeks, unlimited items, 20 AI scans/month)

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from terma.corebits.uk's own website on 2026-09-18.
Operator: TermaStudios, as named in terma.corebits.uk's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-18.

Put together from public information, without terma's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit terma → · Alternatives to terma → · How this was measured →