Developer Tools

Splinterm

Last updated 2026-08-22 · benchmark measured 2026-08-22 — deterministic & reproducible

Splinterm keeps terminal sessions alive as persistent, daemon-owned workspaces on Wayland.

Is Splinterm production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Splinterm 70 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Splinterm (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — 99/100
• Accessibility — 90/100
• Security — 45/100
• Privacy — 25/100
• Reliability — 100/100
• Standards — 89/100
• Discoverability — 45/100

What we measured

• Security headers present: X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
• No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
• Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
• Real Lighthouse performance run — 147 ms to first byte.
• Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
• 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
• No privacy policy found.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who it's for

Linux developers · DevOps engineers · Terminal power users · Automation tools · SSH users

Visit Splinterm → · Alternatives to Splinterm → · How this was measured →