Legit.Show measured ScreenCI's Security frame at 45/100. Security headers present: X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure ScreenCI?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Developer Tools

ScreenCI

Last updated 2026-07-06 · benchmark measured 2026-10-08 — deterministic & reproducible

ScreenCI records product videos via CI and keeps them up to date automatically.

70/100

7/7 frames

Top 77% of 17,355 measured · #19 of 20 in product demo tool

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-10-08 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of ScreenCI? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/screenci-com/2026-10-08. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored ScreenCI 70/100 on 2026-10-08, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/screenci-com/2026-10-08

Is ScreenCI production-ready?

Legit.Show scores ScreenCI 70 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on ScreenCI (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 67/100
Accessibility — 95/100
Security — 45/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 0/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 92/100
Discoverability — 90/100

What we measured

Security headers present: X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 240 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
No privacy policy found.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who built it

Patrik Pyöriä · product account @screencicom

Who it's for

Development teams · Documentation teams · Product managers · Support teams · SaaS companies

Pricing

Free tier with 3 videos; Pro $99/month (25 live videos, 120 export minutes); Business $249/month (100 live videos, 240 export minutes); usage-based add-ons for additional exports and AI voice narratio

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from screenci.com's own website on 2026-07-06.
Operator: ScreenCI Inc., as named in screenci.com's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-10-08.

Put together from public information, without ScreenCI's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit ScreenCI → · Alternatives to ScreenCI → · How this was measured →