Legit.Show measured SazM's Security frame at 100/100. Security headers present: CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure SazM?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Developer Tools

SazM

Last updated 2026-10-11 · benchmark measured 2026-10-11 — deterministic & reproducible

SazM offers senior engineering on a monthly subscription with 24–48h task turnaround.

99/100

7/7 frames

Top 1% of 17,496 measured

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-10-11 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of SazM? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/sazm-in/2026-10-11. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored SazM 99/100 on 2026-10-11, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/sazm-in/2026-10-11

Is SazM production-ready?

Legit.Show scores SazM 99 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on SazM (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Accessibility; its weakest is Performance. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 95/100
Accessibility — 100/100
Security — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 100/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

Security headers present: CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 538 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Discoverable: structured data, sitemap, OpenGraph image, canonical URL.

Who built it

Saravana Bhava (@saravana_bhava_) · product account @sazmco

Who it's for

Product teams · Startups · Agencies · Businesses needing fast turnaround · Companies avoiding hiring overhead

Pricing

$1,000/month (50% off with code SAZM50; list price $2,000). Month-to-month billing via PayPal. One-off projects available with fixed quotes.

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from sazm.in's own website on 2026-10-11.
Operator: Saravana Bhava, as named in sazm.in's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-10-11.

Put together from public information, without SazM's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit SazM → · Alternatives to SazM → · How this was measured →