Education & Reference
Springer Nature가 Max Planck 논문 두 편을 삭제한 이유
Last updated 2026-06-27 · benchmark measured 2026-08-09 — deterministic & reproducible
Retraction Watch tracks retractions of scientific papers by Nobel Prize winners.
Is Springer Nature가 Max Planck 논문 두 편을 삭제한 이유 production-ready?
Legit.Show scores Springer Nature가 Max Planck 논문 두 편을 삭제한 이유 75 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Springer Nature가 Max Planck 논문 두 편을 삭제한 이유 (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Accessibility; its weakest is Security. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 85/100
- Accessibility — 93/100
- Security — 25/100
- Privacy — 70/100
- Reliability — 90/100
- Standards — 92/100
- Discoverability — 70/100
What we measured
- No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Real Lighthouse performance run — 708 ms to first byte.
- Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
- 2 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
- Has a reachable privacy policy.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
- Discoverable: sitemap, OpenGraph image.
Who built it
Ivan Oransky (@ivanoransky) · product account @RetractionWatch
Who it's for
Scientists · Researchers · Academic institutions · Journal editors · Science journalists
Visit Springer Nature가 Max Planck 논문 두 편을 삭제한 이유 → · Alternatives to Springer Nature가 Max Planck 논문 두 편을 삭제한 이유 → · How this was measured →