Design & Creative
remover.work
Last updated 2026-08-27 · benchmark measured 2026-10-21 — deterministic & reproducible
AI tool for removing backgrounds, watermarks, subtitles, and objects from images and video.
remover.work at a glance
Remover.work is an AI tool that removes backgrounds, watermarks, subtitles, logos, and objects from images and video, aimed at content creators, video editors, e-commerce sellers, TikTok creators, and localization teams.
Good for
- Removing a video background without needing a green screen setup
- Stripping hardcoded subtitles or watermarks from video clips
- Cutting out image backgrounds while keeping fine hair or fur detail
Pricing
Pay-as-you-go, no subscription: Starter $4.99 (40 credits), Creator $14.99 (180 credits), Studio $49.99 (800 credits). Credits never expire.
Questions people ask
Is remover.work free to try?
Yes. Every image gets a free preview up to 1024 px, and video processes the first 5 seconds free at full source resolution with no watermark.
Does background removal need a green screen?
No, video background removal is designed to work on normal footage without a green screen.
Does it handle hair and fine edges well in photos?
Yes, the image workflow is tuned for hair, fur, and soft edges so cutouts don't look harsh or fake.
When do I get charged for a job?
Credits are only charged after a job succeeds; failed jobs cost 0 credits, and quote screens show the estimated cost first.
What file formats and sizes are supported?
Video uploads support MP4, MOV, and WebM up to 1 GB per file; image uploads support PNG, JPG, and WebP up to 50 MB.
Written by Legit.Show from remover.work on 2026-09-30. It does not change the score.
Are you the maker of remover.work? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.
Launched something? Add your product, free.
To cite this score: legit.show/s/remover-work/2026-10-21. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.
Legit.Show scored remover.work 83/100 on 2026-10-21, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/remover-work/2026-10-21
Is remover.work production-ready?
Legit.Show scores remover.work 83 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on remover.work (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Security. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 71/100
- Accessibility — 96/100
- Security — 45/100How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
- Privacy — 75/100How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
- Reliability — 100/100
- Standards — 92/100
- Discoverability — 100/100
What we measured
- Security headers present: HSTS.
- No Content-Security-Policy.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Real Lighthouse performance run — 174 ms to first byte.
- Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
- 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
- Has a reachable privacy policy.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Who built it
Ray Wilson · product account @remover_work
Who it's for
Content creators · Video editors · e-commerce sellers · TikTok creators · Localization teams
Pricing
Pay-as-you-go: Starter Pack $4.99 (40 credits), Creator Pack $14.99 (180 credits), Studio Pack $49.99 (800 credits); credits never expire; free image preview up to 1024px, video first 5 seconds free
Sources and updates
- Description
- Taken from remover.work's own website on 2026-08-27.
- Operator
- remover.work, as named in remover.work's terms, privacy page or footer.
- Benchmark
- Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-10-21.
Put together from public information, without remover.work's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.
Visit remover.work → · Alternatives to remover.work → · How this was measured →