Legit.Show measured Recurse's Security frame at 65/100. Security headers present: HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure Recurse?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

AI & Agents

Recurse

Last updated 2026-09-26 · benchmark measured 2026-09-26 — deterministic & reproducible

Recurse is a pay-per-request platform for composing and running AI agents.

77/100

7/7 frames

Top 54% of 14,148 measured · #7 of 16 in ai agent hosting

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-26 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of Recurse? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/recurse-run/2026-09-26. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Recurse 77/100 on 2026-09-26, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/recurse-run/2026-09-26

Is Recurse production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Recurse 77 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Recurse (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 83/100
Accessibility — 93/100
Security — 65/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 25/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 100/100
Discoverability — 70/100

What we measured

Security headers present: HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
No Content-Security-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 99 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
No privacy policy found.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who built it

@synnada · product account @RunRecurse

Who it's for

AI agents · developers · coding teams · LLM applications · agent builders

Pricing

Pay per request starting with $5 in account; $0.10–$4/1M tokens (input), $0.50–$20/1M tokens (output) depending on model; serverless execution $0.013/minute

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from recurse.run's own website on 2026-09-26.
Operator: Synnada Inc, as named in recurse.run's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-26.

Put together from public information, without Recurse's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Recurse → · Alternatives to Recurse → · How this was measured →