Productivity

NVBCD

Last updated 2026-09-10 · benchmark measured 2026-09-10 — deterministic & reproducible

A humorous 25-question self-check for over-reliance on AI coding tools.

Is NVBCD production-ready?

Legit.Show scores NVBCD 78 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on NVBCD (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Standards; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — 92/100
• Accessibility — 94/100
• Security — 60/100
• Privacy — 25/100
• Reliability — 90/100
• Standards — 97/100
• Discoverability — 87/100

What we measured

• Security headers present: X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
• No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
• Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
• Real Lighthouse performance run — 1145 ms to first byte.
• Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
• 2 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
• No privacy policy found.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who it's for

Software developers · AI tool users · Programmers concerned about AI dependency

Pricing

$12 one-time for optional 30-day rehab program (test itself is free)

Visit NVBCD → · Alternatives to NVBCD → · How this was measured →