AI & Agents
Inquio
Last updated 2026-09-08 · benchmark measured 2026-09-08 — deterministic & reproducible
Inquio analyzes chatbot conversations to surface quality issues and improvement recommendations.
Is Inquio production-ready?
Legit.Show scores Inquio 81 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Inquio (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Discoverability; its weakest is Security. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 58/100
- Accessibility — 93/100
- Security — 55/100
- Privacy — 75/100
- Reliability — 92/100
- Standards — 92/100
- Discoverability — 100/100
What we measured
- Security headers present: HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options.
- No Content-Security-Policy.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Real Lighthouse performance run — 207 ms to first byte.
- Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
- 0 of 0 sampled routes reachable.
- Has a reachable privacy policy.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Who built it
Martin Franc · product account @getInquio
Who it's for
Conversational AI teams · CX teams · Bot developers · Chatbot operators · QA engineers
Pricing
Free plan (1,000 conversations max); Growth plan at $0.012 per conversation; Enterprise plan with custom pricing
Visit Inquio → · Alternatives to Inquio → · How this was measured →