Developer Tools

gremlord

Last updated 2026-09-08 · benchmark measured 2026-09-08 — deterministic & reproducible

Gremlord routes Claude Code requests across multiple AI models with budget controls.

Is gremlord production-ready?

Legit.Show scores gremlord 69 out of 100 — the simple average of its 5 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on gremlord (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Privacy. 5 of the seven frames returned a score; Performance and Accessibility were not measurable on this service and are recorded as null — not as zero. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
• Accessibility — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
• Security — 45/100
• Privacy — 25/100
• Reliability — 100/100
• Standards — 75/100
• Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

• Security headers present: HSTS.
• No Content-Security-Policy.
• Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
• Real Lighthouse performance run — 695 ms to first byte.
• Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
• 1 of 1 sampled routes reachable.
• No privacy policy found.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who built it

Maor Bril (@MaorBril)

Who it's for

Claude Code users · Software engineers · Developers using multiple LLM providers · Budget-conscious teams · Anyone needing model flexibility

Visit gremlord → · Alternatives to gremlord → · How this was measured →