Web · OSS
Octop
Last updated 2026-09-19 · benchmark measured 2026-09-19 — deterministic & reproducible
A smarter, self-hosted AI assistant — multi-user, multi-agent.
Are you the maker of Octop? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.
Launched something? Add your product, free.
To cite this score: legit.show/s/gh-tencentcloud-octop/2026-09-19. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.
Legit.Show scored Octop 61/100 on 2026-09-19, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/gh-tencentcloud-octop/2026-09-19
Is Octop production-ready?
Legit.Show scores Octop 61 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Octop (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Accessibility; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 64/100
- Accessibility — 96/100
- Security — 25/100How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
- Privacy — 25/100How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
- Reliability — 92/100
- Standards — 92/100
- Discoverability — 35/100
What we measured
- No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Real Lighthouse performance run — 1862 ms to first byte.
- Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
- 0 of 0 sampled routes reachable.
- No privacy policy found.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.