Is design-extract secure?

Legit.Show measured design-extract's Security frame at 45/100. Security headers present: HSTS. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure design-extract?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Developer Tools

design-extract

Source: Manavarya09/design-extract · ★ 3301 · JavaScript

Last updated 2026-06-20 · benchmark measured 2026-09-26 — deterministic & reproducible

Open-source CLI tool that reverse-engineers any website's design system.

74/100

7/7 frames

Top 63% of 14,148 measured · #8 of 12 in design-to-code tool

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-26 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of design-extract? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/gh-manavarya09-design-extract/2026-09-26. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored design-extract 74/100 on 2026-09-26, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/gh-manavarya09-design-extract/2026-09-26

Is design-extract production-ready?

Legit.Show scores design-extract 74 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on design-extract (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 58/100
Accessibility — 93/100
Security — 45/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 25/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 100/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

Security headers present: HSTS.
No Content-Security-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 160 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
No privacy policy found.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who built it

Manav Arya Singh (@ManavAryaSingh)

Who it's for

Designers · Developers · AI agents · Design systems teams · Web developers

Pricing

Free (2/day demo, unlimited via CLI), open-source MIT license

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from designlang.app's own website on 2026-06-20.
Operator: Manav Arya Singh, as named in designlang.app's terms, privacy page or footer.
Code: github.com/Manavarya09/design-extract.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-26.

Put together from public information, without design-extract's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit design-extract → · Alternatives to design-extract → · How this was measured →