Legit.Show measured MetaGPT's Security frame at 100/100. Security headers present: CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure MetaGPT?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

AI & Agents

MetaGPT

Source: FoundationAgents/MetaGPT · ★ 68603 · Python

Last updated 2026-06-06 · benchmark measured 2026-09-26 — deterministic & reproducible

AI-powered platform to build and launch full-stack web apps without coding.

91/100

7/7 frames

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-26 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of MetaGPT? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/gh-foundationagents-metagpt/2026-09-26. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored MetaGPT 91/100 on 2026-09-26, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/gh-foundationagents-metagpt/2026-09-26

Is MetaGPT production-ready?

Legit.Show scores MetaGPT 91 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on MetaGPT (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Security; its weakest is Performance. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 61/100
Accessibility — 87/100
Security — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 89/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

Security headers present: CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 489 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Discoverable: structured data, sitemap, OpenGraph image, canonical URL.

Who built it

product account @atoms_dev

Who it's for

Entrepreneurs · SaaS founders · E-commerce builders · Product developers · Non-technical founders

Pricing

Free tier; Pro starting $20/mo (100-350 credits/mo); Max starting $100/mo (500-1500 credits/mo); save up to 21% annually

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from atoms.dev's own website on 2026-06-06.
Code: github.com/FoundationAgents/MetaGPT.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-26.

Put together from public information, without MetaGPT's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit MetaGPT → · Alternatives to MetaGPT → · How this was measured →