Legit.Show measured Folio AI's Security frame at 25/100. No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure Folio AI?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

AI & Agents

Folio AI

Last updated 2026-06-27 · benchmark checked 2026-09-09 · unchanged since 2026-08-08 — deterministic & reproducible

AI agent for building and editing slide decks in PowerPoint and Google Slides.

76/100

7/7 frames

Top 58% of 14,627 measured · #13 of 25 in presentation maker

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-09 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of Folio AI? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/get-folio-ai/2026-09-09. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Folio AI 76/100 on 2026-09-09, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/get-folio-ai/2026-09-09

Is Folio AI production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Folio AI 76 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Folio AI (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Privacy; its weakest is Security. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 68/100
Accessibility — 94/100
Security — 25/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 92/100
Discoverability — 50/100

What we measured

No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 165 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Discoverable: canonical URL.

Who built it

Aymeric Roucher (@AymericRoucher)

Who it's for

Consulting teams · Strategy teams · Business professionals · Enterprise teams

Pricing

Free tier with 500 credits; Starter $0/mo; Plus $10/mo (2,000 credits); Pro $49/mo (5,000 credits); Enterprise $199/mo (20,000 credits); Ultimate $499/mo (50,000 credits). Overage rate $0.01-0.03/cred

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from get-folio.ai's own website on 2026-06-27.
Operator: Verso.ai, as named in get-folio.ai's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-09.

Put together from public information, without Folio AI's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Folio AI → · Alternatives to Folio AI → · How this was measured →