Is FolioPress secure?

Legit.Show measured FolioPress's Security frame at 100/100. Security headers present: CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure FolioPress?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Productivity

FolioPress

Last updated 2026-11-12 · benchmark measured 2026-11-12 — deterministic & reproducible

Website and blog builder with multilingual publishing built in, from €12/month.

99/100

7/7 frames

Top 1% of 19,082 measured · #1 of 60 in website builder

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-11-12 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of FolioPress? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/foliopress-io/2026-11-12. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored FolioPress 99/100 on 2026-11-12, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/foliopress-io/2026-11-12

Is FolioPress production-ready?

Legit.Show scores FolioPress 99 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on FolioPress (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Performance; its weakest is Reliability. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 100/100
Accessibility — 100/100
Security — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 90/100
Standards — 100/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

Security headers present: CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 282 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
2 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Discoverable: structured data, sitemap, OpenGraph image, canonical URL.

Who built it

Miguel Marcos (@rodesia)

Who it's for

Small business owners · E-commerce sellers · Content creators · Multilingual marketers · Global entrepreneurs

Pricing

Bilingual (2 languages): €12/month or €120/year; Multilingual (56 languages): €19/month or €190/year; Studio (5 sites): €49/month or €408/year; 30-day free trial on all plans; annual plans save 17%

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from foliopress.io's own website on 2026-11-12.
Operator: M. Marcos, as named in foliopress.io's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-11-12.

Put together from public information, without FolioPress's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit FolioPress → · Alternatives to FolioPress → · How this was measured →