Productivity

filefew

Last updated 2026-09-22 · benchmark measured 2026-09-22 — deterministic & reproducible

Browser-based tool to compress, merge, convert, and split PDFs and images locally.

Are you the maker of filefew? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/filefew-com/2026-09-22. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored filefew 86/100 on 2026-09-22, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/filefew-com/2026-09-22

Is filefew production-ready?

Legit.Show scores filefew 86 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on filefew (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — 99/100
• Accessibility — 96/100
• Security — 80/100
  How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
• Privacy — 25/100
  How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
• Reliability — 100/100
• Standards — 100/100
• Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

• Security headers present: CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
• No HSTS.
• Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
• Real Lighthouse performance run — 171 ms to first byte.
• Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
• 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
• No privacy policy found.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who it's for

Users with file size limits · Document managers · Students · Professionals needing quick compression

Visit filefew → · Alternatives to filefew → · How this was measured →