Web

FateSpoiler

Last updated 2026-09-23 · benchmark measured 2026-09-23 — deterministic & reproducible

Korean saju × Western astrology. Who you are, who you're meant for, what's coming — read it before it happens.

Are you the maker of FateSpoiler? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/fatespoiler-com/2026-09-23. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored FateSpoiler 76/100 on 2026-09-23, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/fatespoiler-com/2026-09-23

Is FateSpoiler production-ready?

Legit.Show scores FateSpoiler 76 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on FateSpoiler (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Performance. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — 29/100
• Accessibility — 97/100
• Security — 80/100
  How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
• Privacy — 75/100
  How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
• Reliability — 100/100
• Standards — 97/100
• Discoverability — 55/100

What we measured

• Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
• No Content-Security-Policy.
• Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
• Real Lighthouse performance run — 77 ms to first byte.
• Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
• 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
• Has a reachable privacy policy.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Visit FateSpoiler → · How this was measured →