Is Doubleword secure?

Legit.Show measured Doubleword's Security frame at 65/100. Security headers present: HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure Doubleword?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

AI & Agents

Doubleword

Last updated 2026-06-28 · benchmark measured 2026-09-22 — deterministic & reproducible

Low-cost AI inference API for open-weight LLMs with flexible delivery windows.

66/100

7/7 frames

Top 82% of 14,248 measured · #32 of 34 in llm inference api

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-22 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of Doubleword? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/doubleword-ai/2026-09-22. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Doubleword 66/100 on 2026-09-22, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/doubleword-ai/2026-09-22

Is Doubleword production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Doubleword 66 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Doubleword (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Discoverability; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 55/100
Accessibility — 84/100
Security — 65/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 0/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 67/100
Standards — 89/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

Security headers present: HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
No Content-Security-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 1358 ms to first byte.
0 of 0 sampled routes reachable.
No privacy policy found.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Discoverable: structured data, sitemap, OpenGraph image, canonical URL.

Who it's for

AI engineers · Backend developers · Data scientists · ML teams · AI product builders

Pricing

Variable per-token rates by model; DeepSeek-V4-Pro at $1.31/$2.75 (input/output), batch $1.05/$2.20; Qwen models from $0.03-$0.30; up to 80% discount for overnight batch processing

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from doubleword.ai's own website on 2026-06-28.
Operator: Doubleword, as named in doubleword.ai's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-22.

Put together from public information, without Doubleword's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Doubleword → · Alternatives to Doubleword → · How this was measured →