Developer Tools
CodeConnect
Last updated 2026-10-31 · benchmark measured 2026-10-31 — deterministic & reproducible
CodeConnect lets you monitor and interact with coding agents from your iPhone.
CodeConnect at a glance
CodeConnect is an iPhone app that lets developers monitor and interact with Claude Code and Codex coding agents running on their Mac or Linux machines from one mobile screen.
Good for
- Developers who run Claude Code or Codex agents on a Mac or Linux machine and want to check their status from a phone
- Teams running coding agents across multiple machines who want to see all sessions in one place
- Approving or denying agent commands remotely, such as while away from the computer
Pricing
Free for iPhone.
Questions people ask
What operating systems does CodeConnect support?
The iPhone app requires iOS 17 or later. The computer side runs on macOS 13 or later (Apple silicon or Intel) and Linux (x86_64 or arm64), including systems without systemd such as Alpine or most containers.
How does CodeConnect connect my phone to my computer?
It connects your devices through your own Tailscale tailnet using WireGuard, with TLS added on top if your tailnet has HTTPS certificates enabled.
Do I need a CodeConnect account?
No. There is no CodeConnect account to create, and your sessions never pass through a CodeConnect server.
Can I use CodeConnect without Tailscale?
Your local network also works with a setting on the computer, but without Tailscale's encryption or the live terminal.
How do I set up CodeConnect?
Install the free iPhone app, then run one command on your computer (curl -fsSL https://codeconnect.sh | sh), which installs CodeConnect, walks you through Tailscale sign-in, and signs you in to Claude Code or Codex.
Written by Legit.Show from codeconnect.sh on 2026-11-06. It does not change the score.
Are you the maker of CodeConnect? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.
Launched something? Add your product, free.
To cite this score: legit.show/s/codeconnect-sh/2026-10-31. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.
Legit.Show scored CodeConnect 83/100 on 2026-10-31, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/codeconnect-sh/2026-10-31
Is CodeConnect production-ready?
Legit.Show scores CodeConnect 83 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on CodeConnect (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Accessibility; its weakest is Discoverability. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 99/100
- Accessibility — 100/100
- Security — 65/100How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
- Privacy — 70/100How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
- Reliability — 100/100
- Standards — 89/100
- Discoverability — 60/100
What we measured
- Security headers present: HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
- No Content-Security-Policy.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Real Lighthouse performance run — 25 ms to first byte.
- Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
- 2 of 2 sampled routes reachable.
- Has a reachable privacy policy.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Who it's for
Developers · Software engineers · Teams running coding agents · Mac users · Linux users
Pricing
Free for iPhone
Sources and updates
- Description
- Taken from codeconnect.sh's own website on 2026-10-31.
- Operator
- CodeConnect, as named in codeconnect.sh's terms, privacy page or footer.
- Benchmark
- Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-10-31.
Put together from public information, without CodeConnect's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.
Visit CodeConnect → · Alternatives to CodeConnect → · How this was measured →
