Data & Analytics

CiteGEO

Last updated 2026-09-24 · benchmark measured 2026-09-24 — deterministic & reproducible

Open-source tool for tracking when and how AI models mention your brand in answers.

Are you the maker of CiteGEO? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/citegeo-uvansa-com/2026-09-24. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored CiteGEO 70/100 on 2026-09-24, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/citegeo-uvansa-com/2026-09-24

Is CiteGEO production-ready?

Legit.Show scores CiteGEO 70 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on CiteGEO (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Standards; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — 83/100
• Accessibility — 81/100
• Security — 45/100
  How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
• Privacy — 25/100
  How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
• Reliability — 75/100
• Standards — 92/100
• Discoverability — 87/100

What we measured

• Security headers present: X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
• No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
• Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
• Real Lighthouse performance run — 104 ms to first byte.
• 1 of 1 sampled routes reachable.
• No privacy policy found.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
• Discoverable: structured data, sitemap, canonical URL.

Who it's for

SaaS companies · Product managers · Marketing teams · Brand strategists

Visit CiteGEO → · Alternatives to CiteGEO → · How this was measured →