Developer Tools
Subscribing to feeds
Last updated 2026-08-03 · benchmark checked 2026-09-15 · unchanged since 2026-08-14 — deterministic & reproducible
Chrome design document for RSS/Atom feed subscription handling in the browser.
Are you the maker of Subscribing to feeds? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.
Launched something? Add your product, free.
To cite this score: legit.show/s/chromium-org/2026-09-15. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.
Legit.Show scored Subscribing to feeds 64/100 on 2026-09-15, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/chromium-org/2026-09-15
Is Subscribing to feeds production-ready?
Legit.Show scores Subscribing to feeds 64 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Subscribing to feeds (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Performance; its weakest is Discoverability. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 100/100
- Accessibility — 90/100
- Security — 65/100How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
- Privacy — 25/100How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
- Reliability — 92/100
- Standards — 67/100
- Discoverability — 10/100
What we measured
- Security headers present: CSP, HSTS.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Real Lighthouse performance run — 75 ms to first byte.
- Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
- 0 of 0 sampled routes reachable.
- No privacy policy found.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
- Discoverable: sitemap.
Who it's for
Chrome users · Feed reader developers · Web developers
Sources and updates
- Description
- Taken from chromium.org's own website on 2026-08-03.
- Benchmark
- Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-15.
Put together from public information, without Subscribing to feeds's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.
Visit Subscribing to feeds → · Alternatives to Subscribing to feeds → · How this was measured →