Legit.Show measured Chow's Security frame at 25/100. No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure Chow?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Productivity

Chow

Last updated 2026-09-29 · benchmark measured 2026-09-29 — deterministic & reproducible

Chow is a distraction-free food diary app with no ads, tracking, or activity feeds.

73/100

7/7 frames

Top 66% of 14,379 measured · #25 of 31 in nutrition tracking app

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-29 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of Chow? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/chow-fit/2026-09-29. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Chow 73/100 on 2026-09-29, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/chow-fit/2026-09-29

Is Chow production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Chow 73 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Chow (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Performance; its weakest is Discoverability. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 100/100
Accessibility — 100/100
Security — 25/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 92/100
Standards — 70/100
Discoverability — 25/100

What we measured

No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 186 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
0 of 0 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Discoverable: sitemap.

Who it's for

Health-conscious eaters · Weight loss seekers · People wanting simple food logging · Privacy-focused users · Fitness enthusiasts

Pricing

Free Forever ($0 local only); Monthly $4.95/month; Yearly $3.33/month (billed at $39.95 annually)

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from chow.fit's own website on 2026-09-29.
Operator: EnduraByte LLC, as named in chow.fit's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-29.

Put together from public information, without Chow's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Chow → · Alternatives to Chow → · How this was measured →