Education & Reference
Unit, Integration, E2E, Contract, X tests
Last updated 2026-06-25 · benchmark measured 2026-08-09 — deterministic & reproducible
A guide to choosing the right automated test types for your software projects.
Is Unit, Integration, E2E, Contract, X tests production-ready?
Legit.Show scores Unit, Integration, E2E, Contract, X tests 74 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Unit, Integration, E2E, Contract, X tests (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 98/100
- Accessibility — 96/100
- Security — 25/100
- Privacy — 25/100
- Reliability — 100/100
- Standards — 92/100
- Discoverability — 85/100
What we measured
- No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Real Lighthouse performance run — 228 ms to first byte.
- Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
- 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
- No privacy policy found.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
- Discoverable: structured data, sitemap, OpenGraph image.
Who it's for
Software developers · QA engineers · Engineering teams · Technical leads
Visit Unit, Integration, E2E, Contract, X tests → · Alternatives to Unit, Integration, E2E, Contract, X tests → · How this was measured →