Productivity
Anteroom
Last updated 2026-08-05 · benchmark measured 2026-08-05 — deterministic & reproducible
A multiplayer terminal casino that fills wait time during long build tasks.
76/100
Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 6 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.
Is Anteroom production-ready?
Legit.Show scores Anteroom 76 out of 100 — the simple average of its 6 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Anteroom (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Privacy; its weakest is Security. 6 of the seven frames returned a score; Accessibility was not measurable on this service and is recorded as null — not as zero. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 80/100
- Accessibility — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
- Security — 25/100
- Privacy — 100/100
- Reliability — 100/100
- Standards — 75/100
- Discoverability — 75/100
What we measured
- No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Real Lighthouse performance run — 105 ms to first byte.
- Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
- 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
- Has a reachable privacy policy.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
- Discoverable: OpenGraph image, canonical URL.
Who built it
Who it's for
developers · CI/CD users · build engineers