Education & Reference
system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools
Last updated 2026-06-06 · benchmark measured 2026-06-10 — deterministic & reproducible
FULL Augment Code, Claude Code, Cluely, CodeBuddy, Comet, Cursor, Devin AI, Junie, Kiro, Leap.new, Lovable, Manus, NotionAI, Orchids.app, Perplexity, Poke, Qoder, Replit, Same.dev, Trae, Traycer AI, VSCode Agent, Warp.dev, Windsurf, Xcode, Z.ai Code, Dia & v0. (And other Open Sou
Is system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools production-ready?
Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools (github assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Standards; its weakest is Discoverability. The per-frame breakdown is public on the Legit.Show listing; the single overall production-readiness score is reserved for the verified maker.
The 7 Frames
- Security — 90/100
- Standards — 100/100
- Discoverability — 65/100
- Maintenance — 100/100
What we measured
- No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
- No privacy policy found.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Visit system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools → · How this was measured →