Education & Reference
Aaron v. Bondi
EFF lawsuit defending a developer whose immigration-reporting app was removed from the App Store.
61/100
7-Frame production-readiness — according to Legit.Show
Is Aaron v. Bondi production-ready?
Legit.Show measured Aaron v. Bondi at 61 out of 100 on its 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark (public-surface assessment). Its strongest frame is Reliability (100); its weakest is Privacy (0). Every frame is measured deterministically from the public surface — exactly what was observed is shown below.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 57/100
- Accessibility — 78/100
- Security — 35/100
- Privacy — 0/100
- Reliability — 100/100
- Standards — 92/100
- Discoverability — 65/100
What we measured
- Security headers present: X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options.
- No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Lighthouse performance score 57/100 (76 ms to first byte).
- Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
- 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
- No privacy policy found.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Who it's for
App developers · Digital rights advocates · First Amendment defenders · Civil liberties organizations