Education & Reference

Aaron v. Bondi

Last updated 2026-06-21 · benchmark measured 2026-08-09 — deterministic & reproducible

EFF lawsuit defending a developer whose immigration-reporting app was removed from the App Store.

Is Aaron v. Bondi production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Aaron v. Bondi 65 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Aaron v. Bondi (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — 57/100
• Accessibility — 78/100
• Security — 35/100
• Privacy — 25/100
• Reliability — 100/100
• Standards — 92/100
• Discoverability — 65/100

What we measured

• Security headers present: X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options.
• No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
• Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
• Real Lighthouse performance run — 79 ms to first byte.
• Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
• 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
• No privacy policy found.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who it's for

App developers · Digital rights advocates · First Amendment defenders · Civil liberties organizations

Visit Aaron v. Bondi → · Alternatives to Aaron v. Bondi → · How this was measured →